The purpose of this paper is to understand how the so-called border sciences use the scientific method to obtain results that confirm their underlying theoretical apparatus.
The academic sciences use a standardized method, the border sciences use the same method, but revised according to specific needs, eliminating and/or distorting, even naively, key elements of the research. It is also shown if, for some of such disciplines, the scientific method should be revised in some way.
Be the first to comment on "Pseudo-scientific phenomena. Should we re-think the scientific method? Invalidating the concept of validity"